Announcement

Collapse

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 7
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 7 template Next
    #1

    Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

    "Vudu Test Confirms HD Download Worries (Plus: What Needs to Be Done)"
    http://gizmodo.com/352392/vudu-test-...eds-to-be-done

    Over the weekend, I checked out three versions of the Transformers movie: standard-def and high-def instantaneous downloads to the Vudu box with 4-Mbps net connection, as well as the HD DVD of the movie, playing through the Xbox 360. As you can see in the image above, the so-called HD experience from Vudu wasn't one that could come close to comparing with the HD DVD playback. In fact, it was awfully hard to see a vivid difference between that and the perfectly fine (and $2 cheaper) SD download...
    Tags: None
    #2
    Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

    I just saw this too. Not a particularly scientific test or conclusion.

    - The frames captured were not the same for each source
    - I watched transformers HD last week and it was *much* sharper and clearer than the DVD version of the movie (wouldn't that be a fairer comparison?)


    I did the same test as them with the Bourne Identitiy back when I first got my VUDU (watched the standard def versus the high def versions). I'll confess that for certain scenes it was tough to see a massive difference between the SD and HD versions. But for *other* scenes the difference was very noticeable. He picked a terrible frame to compare - I failed to see the "vivid" difference between the vudu SD and the HD-dvd versions!

    Maybe his headline should be "throw away your HD-DVD players and get VUDU as their SD is practically as good as HD-DVD - and oh yeah, has the support of many more studios"

    Comment

      #3
      Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

      What resolution was the perosn watching at? If it's 1080i, does his equipment deinterlace properly?
      I know in my setup there is a very obvious difference between the SD DVd, VUDU HD and the HD DVD.
      The VUDU HD version of course isn't as good as the HD DVD(but close enough), but it is much much better than the SD DVD.
      Either the persons equipment isn't set up properly or the person is partially blind.

      Comment

        #4
        Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

        Does anybody know how they capture the output? With a digital camera? Or are they capturing of component in 480p?

        It also depends on the output mode. In 1080i pause shows only 1 field.

        Comment

          #5
          Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

          Originally posted by VolkerS View Post
          Does anybody know how they capture the output? With a digital camera? Or are they capturing of component in 480p?

          It also depends on the output mode. In 1080i pause shows only 1 field.
          Something was worng with the persons setup. the difference is glaringly obvious in my setup between the SD DVD and the VUDU HD version.

          Comment

            #6
            Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

            Originally posted by Rusdude View Post
            "Vudu Test Confirms HD Download Worries (Plus: What Needs to Be Done)"
            http://gizmodo.com/352392/vudu-test-...eds-to-be-done
            I don't want be a buzz kill, but this goes right back to my earlier comments about my willingness to wait a little longer for higher quality content instead of needing to be able to watch it instantly with a compromise for quality.

            After all, before Vudu, It would take me days or longer to get a Netflix movie. So just to have a title "available" and to be able to get within hours (instead of days) is a tremendous step forward.

            I don't really know what current video compression options are available.

            But I do know for audio codecs, their are a slew of options ranging from near CD quality to better than CD quality.

            Disk space use to be a limiting factor for which audio option to use, but space is so cheap now days, I "always" choose better than CD quality when ripping or recording audio tracks.

            So assuming those same types of video codec options exist, I vote for the highest quality video that's technically possible, even if it takes longer before I can watch the movie.

            Comment

              #7
              Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

              I tried commenting on Gizmodo, but they never approve any of my comments.

              Comment

                #8
                Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                Gizmodo is such a feaking "I wanna be a tech journalist" weenie hack site.

                These guys get just about everything wrong. Anyone who puts trust in what they say is silly...

                Comment

                  #9
                  Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                  Originally posted by NA9D View Post
                  Gizmodo is such a feaking "I wanna be a tech journalist" weenie hack site.

                  These guys get just about everything wrong. Anyone who puts trust in what they say is silly...
                  I never go to Gizmodo, so you could be correct.

                  On the other hand, it would be nice (and interesting) if Vudu could be a little more transparent about there encoding quality. It doesn't seem to really cut it by just saying they use Mpeg4 (or H.324, or whatever they use)

                  The truth is out there!

                  Regards

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                    I have a Gawker (Gizmodo/Kotaku/etc.) comments account and commented in the post asking Wilson for details on the outpu he was using. I also emailed him (wilson@gizmodo.com) and invited to post in this thread.

                    Anyway, I think whenever Apple releases their HD rentals, it'd be nice if someone in the position of authority could do a comprehensive comparison of image quality of various formats (e.g. SD DVD, Vudu SD, Apple SD, Xbox SD, Vudu HD, Apple HD, Xbox HD, cable/FIOS HD VOD, Blu-Ray/HD-DVD) across multiple titles so we could have good basis for saying ___ is best VOD and ____ close to high-def media. Until that happens we might be stuck with with [mini-]reviews like this.

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                      Originally posted by RobertHodge View Post
                      On the other hand, it would be nice (and interesting) if Vudu could be a little more transparent about there encoding quality. It doesn't seem to really cut it by just saying they use Mpeg4 (or H.324, or whatever they use)
                      I don't know what else you want. We know the file size is about 3 to 5 Gigabytes depending on the movie. The bit rate of the encoding is variable. The codec used is H.264 which is a public standard.

                      The exact details of Vudu's encoding is proprietary (ie: trade secret).

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                        Originally posted by Rusdude View Post
                        it'd be nice if someone in the position of authority could do a comprehensive comparison of image quality of various formats (e.g. SD DVD, Vudu SD, Apple SD, Xbox SD, Vudu HD, Apple HD, Xbox HD, cable/FIOS HD VOD, Blu-Ray/HD-DVD) across multiple titles so we could have good basis for saying ___ is best VOD and ____ close to high-def media. Until that happens we might be stuck with with [mini-]reviews like this.
                        I agree, it would be nice to have some definitive benchmarks. It would also make great sales and marketing material too (assuming the product in fact compares well with the competition).

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                          Originally posted by RobertHodge View Post
                          On the other hand, it would be nice (and interesting) if Vudu could be a little more transparent about there encoding quality. It doesn't seem to really cut it by just saying they use Mpeg4 (or H.324, or whatever they use)
                          Does DirectTV or Comcast disclose there bitrates or quality? They are trade secrets just as VUDU's/

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                            Originally posted by NA9D View Post
                            I don't know what else you want. We know the file size is about 3 to 5 Gigabytes depending on the movie. The bit rate of the encoding is variable. The codec used is H.264 which is a public standard.

                            The exact details of Vudu's encoding is proprietary (ie: trade secret).
                            The problem is that I don't understand it well enough to know what I really want. I only have my audio codec ripping experience to fall back on.

                            Thanks for replying though. I really do apprecate it.

                            Regards

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Re: Gizmodo's Take on Vudu's HD Quality

                              You know the thing about this all is that no one (not even the "Moderators with an Agenda") have stated that Vudu is as good as or better than HD-DVD or BluRay. I would expect Vudu's HD quality to not be as good. And some day, I'll buy a BluRay player but I'm waiting for the format war to end.

                              But what does Vudu bring me? The ability to instantly watch any of the movies in the library w/o having to run to the doggone video store or pay a monthly fee to Netflix. The HD quality is certainly as good as what Comcast gives me on their VOD system but with far more selection.

                              If there's a movie that I really want in HD, then I will probably buy it on an HD format. So say they release Lord of the Rings in BluRay and in HD on Vudu. I'd buy the BluRay version in a heartbeat as its something I'd want to have on my library shelves and when I want to watch that movie, I want the full experience. But Vudu gives me a great experience for movies that aren't my "favorites" or aren't until I watch them the first time...

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 7 template Next
                              Working...
                              X