Announcement

Collapse

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • musacfreak73
    replied
    Re: Batman Begins wrong aspect ratio?

    Originally posted by creekside View Post
    If Vudu ever wants to be taken seriously by film enthusiasts then it must clearly disclose, prior to purchase, whether a file has been altered from the original cinema format. There is nothing worse for the film buff than to realize he has purchased only part of a film after the fact. The Wild Bunch was my first shock. Vudu's presentation of Peckinpah's cinematographic masterpiece on Vudu is un-watchable. It surprises me that there are so few replies to this thread.
    I agree 100%

    I just found this thread after purchasing a lot of movies and found that quite a few of my purchases have been cropped.

    When I purchase the HDX version of the movie, it should be what VUDU is advertising and be the best that there is to offer and to be offering cropped versions of movies is unacceptable.

    When there is a blu-ray version of most movies that is available in the correct aspect ratio, I do not see how VUDU is getting an improper version to put on the sight for us to purchase.

    If I could get my money back for the movies that I've purchased that are in the correct ratio, exchange for other movies that are correct, or just get more updates from VUDU regarding getting the correct versions and those being added to my collection, I'd be happy.

    Leave a comment:


  • creekside
    replied
    Re: Batman Begins wrong aspect ratio?

    If Vudu ever wants to be taken seriously by film enthusiasts then it must clearly disclose, prior to purchase, whether a file has been altered from the original cinema format. There is nothing worse for the film buff than to realize he has purchased only part of a film after the fact. The Wild Bunch was my first shock. Vudu's presentation of Peckinpah's cinematographic masterpiece on Vudu is un-watchable. It surprises me that there are so few replies to this thread.

    Since the question was raised, any decent HD TV should offer zoom for those casual viewers who insist that their screen be filled at all costs. If you primarily watch made for TV rather than made for the theater chances are that most content will have been produced for 16 x 9 format and aspect is a non-issue. But if you even occasionally watch a film at home then you will want to pay close attention to the scanning and presentations capabilities of any tv which you are considering for purchase. My low mid range LG offers the following which can be toggled from a single button on the remote 16:9 > Just Scan > Set by Program > 4:3 > Zoom > Cinema Zoom 1 > Cinema Zoom 2.

    For the newbie that may seem a bit overwhelming but just go to any wide shot, preferably a day shot with architectural features or landscape and pause the video, for instance the scene from Dark Knight 41:10 where the city is seen in back round from within the glass walled office.

    Scroll through the "ratio" choices. Note how much is cut off each side. Is the depth perspective or impact of the shot destroyed at the cost of watching full screen? For any decent director the answer will be an emphatic yes.

    Regardless of your individual preference at the moment all the visual detail and original composition should be available for viewing otherwise it's more like having bought a thumbnail rather than the original.

    note: You should have already set up Vudu from the main app scene to size the test image which is quite simple.

    Results are going to vary from film to film and with the quality of the digital transfer along with how faithful the set is.
    Not a recommendation by any means but LG 47CM565 47-Inch Cinema 3D 1080p 60Hz LCD HDTV (2012 Model) was purchased as a closeout for $300. You need not over-spend to get multiple aspect display capability these days.

    If you've purchased a digital movie and find that you were sold only part of the goods ( i.e. cropped ) SPEAK UP by opening a Support case. Vudu may only be able to offer what it gets from the studio but there is no excuse for failure to disclose. Consumers demanded and got this from disc and there is no reason that they should not be informed of altered format with digital.

    Leave a comment:


  • echopulse
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Do what you wish, but just as an FYI Robert Harris who is an expert film historian and restoration expert says the correct ratio is 1.37:1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Harris

    Leave a comment:


  • phibbus
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by prkprkprk View Post
    The 1.75:1 version is the one that's on the BD and what's listed on IMDb. So, in this case, it will stay on the list.
    The 1.75:1 bluray of Sword in the Stone is a disaster, video-wise (see the review at blu-ray.com and note the horrible top and bottom cropping of the two large screencaps, there.)

    While I haven't purchased the Vudu version and thus don't know if it suffers from the same over-processing of the BD transfer, I'd still rather have the choice of watching the full frame shot by the animators or cropping down to 1.78 manually on my TV.

    Leave a comment:


  • prkprkprk
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by echopulse View Post
    Sword in the Stone was released only a few years after the introduction of widescreen, so not all theaters had been converted yet. So either ratio could be considered correct, but I prefer to see the whole scene as intended by the animators, regardless of the way it was shown at a particular theater.
    The 1.75:1 version is the one that's on the BD and what's listed on IMDb. So, in this case, it will stay on the list.

    Leave a comment:


  • echopulse
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Sword in the Stone was released only a few years after the introduction of widescreen, so not all theaters had been converted yet. So either ratio could be considered correct, but I prefer to see the whole scene as intended by the animators, regardless of the way it was shown at a particular theater.

    Leave a comment:


  • prkprkprk
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by echopulse View Post
    Actually, Sword in the Stone is correct, it was animated in the Academy Ratio of 1.33:1.
    It was animated in 1.33:1, but was released in theaters in 1.75:1, thus the AR presented isn't the original theatrical aspect ratio.

    Originally posted by musacfreak73 View Post
    I was watching a 2 minute preview of "Bad Day At Black Rock" and noticed that it went from 2:35.1 to 1:78.1 before the 2 minutes was up. This another to add to your list.
    Just added it. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • phibbus
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by prkprkprk View Post
    Mysterious Island (OAR: 1.85:1, Vudu: 1.33:1)
    Please don NOT "update" Mysterious Island! Vudu is currently the only place you can get a 1080p transfer of the uncropped, full frame scan.

    While IMDb states the aspect ratio as 1.85:1, like all open matte flicks of the '50s and '60s, it was shot at Academy standard 1.37:1. While strictly intended to be projected at 1:85:1 in the US, few theaters ever actually cropped these films that wide (most coming closer to the UK 1.66:1.)

    Furthermore, Harryhausen was not a widescreen fan, and all of the matte painting shots and most of the animation effects shots in this film are obviously composed to the full frame he was shooting, not the intended theatrical ratio. The current US DVD release demonstrates how miserably this picture fares at 1.85:1, with large swaths of important stuff being cut off the top and bottom of the screen. Even the limited-release bluray at a more modest 1.67:1 compromise doesn't look quite right in a bunch of scenes.

    While many/most open matte films of the period do fare well at their intended theatrical aspect ratios, this ain't one of them. Please leave it at the full frame 1.37:1 and allow me to choose whether or not to crop it on my TV.

    Leave a comment:


  • echopulse
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Actually, Sword in the Stone is correct, it was animated in the Academy Ratio of 1.33:1.

    Leave a comment:


  • musacfreak73
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    I was watching a 2 minute preview of "Bad Day At Black Rock" and noticed that it went from 2:35.1 to 1:78.1 before the 2 minutes was up. This another to add to your list.

    Leave a comment:


  • prkprkprk
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by Gnatevil View Post
    Add Sword in the Stone. OAR 1.75:1 showing 1.33:1.
    This sucks cause it's one of the first Disney movies available thru Digital Copy and it's screwed up.
    Sorry this took so long, but I have it added to the list now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gnatevil
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Add Sword in the Stone. OAR 1.75:1 showing 1.33:1.
    This sucks cause it's one of the first Disney movies available thru Digital Copy and it's screwed up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mega Powers
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by YaakaKhiladi View Post
    Can someone explain to me what all these movies should look like?
    I just watched bits of 300, Hangover 2, and RE Retribution, and besides SD quality on the latter 2, they all looked fine.
    Are they incorrectly zoomed in or something? I personally can't tell
    I don't have any of those titles on Vudu, but that is exactly what the issue is. The picture is wider than 1.78:1, but has been zoomed-in to fit a 1.78:1 or 16:9 television. This also happens a lot with movies on cable and premium cable channels. It's horrible in some cases like Ben-Hur which was filmed in 2.76:1 (super wide). It's not as bad for films with a 1.85:1 aspect ratio, because there isn't that much of a difference, though that does still bother me in some cases.

    Leave a comment:


  • YaakaKhiladi
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Can someone explain to me what all these movies should look like?
    I just watched bits of 300, Hangover 2, and RE Retribution, and besides SD quality on the latter 2, they all looked fine.
    Are they incorrectly zoomed in or something? I personally can't tell.

    Accountant Gold Coast

    Leave a comment:


  • ydkjman
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by prkprkprk View Post
    Yes, I will be updating the "Recently Fixed" list with titles that have been corrected.
    Thanks for the hard work on this and keeping it up to date.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X